Finding An Offshore Bank For Your Asset Protection Plan
Foreign bank accounts are an integral part of offshore asset protection. Clients who establish limited liability companies or corporations in foreign jurisdictions for asset protection frequent ask where and how their entities can set up a foreign bank account. This past week I visited an executive manager of a well-established offshore trust company that assists asset protection for U.S. citizens. The company serves as manager of foreign LLCs or as trustee of foreign trusts. The manager told me that the offshore banking environment has changed significantly in the past year or two as the IRS has cracked down on banks that have maintained secret bank accounts for U.S. taxpayers.
Continue reading "Finding An Offshore Bank For Your Asset Protection Plan"
July 6, 2009 in Offshore Planning | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tax Reporting Requirements For Offshore Asset Protection
Many callers and clients express interest in offshore asset protection planning. I have prepared some offshore trusts and many offshore limited liability companies over time. Any type of offshore asset protection is complicated, in part, because of IRS reporting requirements applicable to foreign entities. I suspect there are many people with offshore asset protection entities who don't understand or comply with tax reporting rules. For example, a single member domestic limited liability company is by default a disregarded entity for tax purposes. This means the LLC on the entity level reports nothing to the IRS and is not required to get a separate tax number. The member treats the domestic LLC as a sole proprietorship for tax purposes. A single member foreign LLC established by a U.S. resident must file an election form 8832 to claim disregarded entity status. If it does not file this form timely the LLC may be treated as a C corporation and subject to corporate taxation. In addition, the offshore LLC once electing disregarded status must file information form 8858. Offshore entities taxed as partnership or corporation have different filing requirements.
Continue reading "Tax Reporting Requirements For Offshore Asset Protection"
June 28, 2009 in Offshore Planning | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Liability For Dog Bites
"Every dog is entitled to one bite." This saying refers to a legal tradition that a dog owner cannot foresee his dog is dangerous before the dog has actually bitten someone. The first dog bite puts the dog’s owner on notice to protect the public from his dog. Prior to the dog’s first bite, the tradition is that the dog’s owner cannot be held liable to foresee his dog’s poor behavior. Many people discount legal risk from their dog because they see their own dog as peaceful and well-behaved. People do not contemplate that their well-behaved dog could ever get them in legal problem prior to that "first bite." In Florida, the law is different. There are Florida statutes on dog liability that holds owners liable prior to the dog’s first bite.
Continue reading "Liability For Dog Bites "
June 25, 2009 in Florida Protections | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Using Exculpatory Clauses To Limit Liability For Negligence
Some businesses try to limit negligence lawsuits associated with their services or products by having customers sign agreements with "exculpatory clauses." An exculpatory clause denies or limits the customer’s right to sue the business for the business’ own negligence. These clauses may influence some potential litigants to drop potential legal actions, but business owners should not rely fully on exculpatory clauses. Florida courts have viewed exculpatory clauses with suspicion and as being contrary to public policy. Courts have stated that they will consider exculpatory provisions only to the extent that their appeared to be a clear intention of both parties to relieve one party from liability and where the exculpatory language was clear and unequivocal. Also, exculpatory clauses can never insulate a business from willful, malicious or grossly negligent conduct which injures another person.
June 25, 2009 in Effective Planning Strategies | Permalink | Comments (0)
Homestead Protection Not Afforded To House Titled In A Family Partnership
Only individuals can claim homestead protection. The Florida Constitution states that homestead protection applies to "natural persons." I read a case this week wherein a debtor had transferred their homestead property to a family limited partnership for estate planning and estate tax purposes. The debtor owned 95% of the limited partnership interests, and there was a partnership agreement permitted the same debtor to reside in the house. The debtor claimed that the property should qualify as exempt homestead because he had the right to occupy the house under the terms of the partnership agreement. The debtor claimed that he had indirect equitable title to the property, and that his interest was sufficient to warrant homestead protection from his creditors.
Continue reading "Homestead Protection Not Afforded To House Titled In A Family Partnership"
June 23, 2009 in Homestead Protections | Permalink | Comments (0)
Court Protects Homestead Property Used For Debtor's Commercial Business
Homestead protection applies to homes and land occupied by a debtor as his primary residence. Property used for commercial purposes or for the production of income generally does not qualify for homestead protection. A Florida bankruptcy court recently considered married joint debtors who used part of a homestead property for his residence and part of the same property for business and income production. The issue was whether the partial business use disqualified all or part of the debtors’ homestead protection from their judgment creditors. The two debtors owned a five acre parcel of land in the county. They built their residence on a minority portion of the land. The debtors had two more buildings on the same land. One building was a warehouse used exclusively for the debtors’ business. The third building was a second residence rented to an unrelated third party. In other words, two of the three structures occupying most of the property were used commercially.
Continue reading "Court Protects Homestead Property Used For Debtor's Commercial Business"
June 22, 2009 in Homestead Protections | Permalink | Comments (0)
