« Confusing Offshore Planning With Income Tax Avoidance | Main | Tenancy by Entireties Strengthened in Bankruptcy »

Tenants by Entireties Ownership of Automobiles Not Possible

It may be impossible to own a automobile as tenants by entireties in the State of Florida based on a decision entered December 3, 2004, by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in the case of Vongsack Xayavong and Damomonh Xayavong v. Sunny Gifts, Inc. (cite not yet available). In this case, the creditor, Sunny Gifts, seized an automobile titled in the Xayavongs’ names as husband or wife. The appellate court in this case held that the presumption established by the Florida Supreme Court in favor of tenants by entireties ownership of all jointly owned marital property does not apply to cars. The reason for the court’s holding was that a Florida statute, F.S. 319.22, states that when co-owners title a vehicle using the conjunction "or" the vehicle shall be held in joint tenancy (not tenants by entireties). The court said that the statute eliminates uncertainty about the form of ownership, and therefore, the presumptions in Beal Bank are not needed to resolve ambiguity of the owners’ intent.

Interesting, the same statute says that when a married couple owns a car as husband and wife, then upon the death of the first spouse to die ownership does not automatically pass to the survivor. Automatic transfers upon death to a co-owner are known legally as "survivorship" of title. In Beal Bank the Supreme Court said clearly that survivorship of title is a necessary element of tenancy by the entireties. Therefore, a car owned by husband and wife also cannot be owned as tenants by entireties because by statute the essential element of survivorship is absent.

So, after the Xayavong decisions of the Fifth DCA and the Supreme Court’s Beal Bank decision neither ownership of a car by husband or wife or ownership as husband and wife produces a tenancy by entireties car title. Those choices, and & or , are the only two options presented on Florida’s car registration form. These decisions logically make it impossible for a married couple to own a car as tenants by entireties.

December 4, 2004 in Court Decisions | Permalink

Comments

I am not listed as a debtor, but my husband is. We own a car in husband "OR" wife. Isn't it MY FLORIDA LEGAL right to remove his name. I am the only driver of this car. If the car is seized the judge will refuse to give me "half" or even one dime of the value. This car was a birthday present to me!!! Why can't I exercise my legal rights in the state of Florida?

Posted by: Amy | Dec 22, 2007 10:43:11 AM

Fascinating! I just may be the first one to test out whether "and" will establish TBE on an auto. I know the sheriff will not levy on an "and" vehicle but I might be able to get a court order in proceedings supplemental. Thanks!

Posted by: madlaw | Jan 11, 2005 2:50:04 PM

Boats should not be titled as TBE property either. It should be in the name of the person who will be driving it and only that person should drive it.

Posted by: Tye Klooster | Jan 5, 2005 2:14:02 PM

WHAT ABOUT BOATS. CAN THEY BE TITLED TBE?

Posted by: TOM MCLEOD | Dec 8, 2004 9:34:27 AM

WHAT ABOUT BOATS. CAN THEY BE TITLED TBE?

Posted by: TOM MCLEOD | Dec 8, 2004 9:34:25 AM

You note lack of TBE protection as if vehicles should be titled as TBE property in the first place.

Due to the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, we almost universally recommend that vehicles not be titled as TBE (or as JTWROS) property. This doctrine holds the owner of the vehicle liable as well as the negligent driver of the vehicle. If the car is owned as TBE, both h and w are now liable and potentially all TBE property is subject to attachment.

As such, we recommend that each vehcile be titled in the name of the primary driver and that everyone go one step further--to drive only your vehicle. If this routine is followed and one is in an accident, TBE property will remain protected.

TJK

Posted by: Tye Klooster | Dec 7, 2004 2:27:30 PM

Post a comment