« Is Commercial Activity on Florida Homestead Permissible? | Main | LLC vs. Family Partnership: Best Asset Protection Tool »
Florida Supreme Court Issues Doc Stamp Decision
A recent blog post discussed the Department of Revenue’s position on documentary stamps for transfers of real property in asset protection planning. Asset protection often involves conveyance of real property you own individually to your partnerships and limited liability companies . In the past, the Department was insisting on your paying documentary stamps where the legal entity that received the property was owned by the same individuals who owned the property to begin with. Recently, according to the recent post, the Department has retreated from its position and had imposed tax on such transfers only to the extent of a mortgage balance, if any, encumbering the property.
Last week, the Florida Supreme Court issued a legal opinion which affirmed the more liberal ruling of the documentary tax statute. The Supreme Court said that, “the transfer of property between a grantor and its wholly owned grantee, absent any exchange of value, is without consideration or a purchaser and thus not subject to the documentary stamp tax in section 201.02(1).” Transfers to wholly owned entities will be taxed on the amount of mortgage liability consistent with prior rulings of the court. This decision makes asset protection planning less expensive for people who own Florida real property. Crescent Miami Center, LLC v. Florida Department of Revenue No. SC03-2063.
posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy lawyer, Orlando, Florida.
May 22, 2005 in Court Decisions | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/14170/2495874
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Florida Supreme Court Issues Doc Stamp Decision:
Comments
Regarding the Cresent case, I'm curious whether any new decisions have eliminated the doc stamp burden when transfering encumbered property to a wholly owned corp or LLC? It seems patently unfair that one would have to pay doc stamps on property that they still own 100% of the beneficial interest and that the burden of the mortgage has not shifted after the transaction has completed. Has there been any recent developments in this area?
Posted by: phil | Feb 4, 2008 5:44:24 PM





