« Homestead and Entireties Question From Reader | Main | Don't Try To Use Fake Documents For Asset Protection »
Should You Hire An Attorney To Defend Mortgage Foreclosure? In Most Cases, "Yes"
If you choose to stop paying your mortgage payments the lender will sue for foreclosure and sooner or later, one way or another, the delinquent homeowner will most likely lose the lawsuit and the lender will sell the house at foreclosure sale. I am often asked whether the homeowner should simply “let the house go” or “just turn in the keys”, or whether they should retain an attorney to defend the foreclosure even though the chance of winning is small. I now think in most cases the homeowner should defend the foreclosure suit. I don’t litigate foreclosure cases. I refer clients to other attorneys who practice in real estate or commercial litigation. More and more, people who hire attorneys to defend foreclosures obtain positive results. Here is one example reported to me by the litigation attorney this week.
My clients could not afford any more mortgage payments for a property that was substantially “upside down” in equity. I referred the clients to a real estate litigator. The real estate attorney filed several defenses to the foreclosure complaint and used many legitimate procedural tactics to delay the foreclosure. In most cases, the lender attorney encounter no borrower resistence. When they encounter “problem cases” they are often open to a negotiated settlement in order not to spend inordinate amount of time or resources on one property. Lenders do not like to spend good money on bad loans.
In this instance, the homeowner’s attorney saw that the lender was becoming frustrated early in the foreclosure case. The homeowner’s attorney made the following offer: the homeowner would drop defenses to foreclosure; in exchange, the lender would agree not to pursue any deficiency judgment and further stipulate that the property value equaled the loan amount on day of foreclosure sale (therefore, there was not taxable forgiveness of debt). The lender quickly accepted the offer. My former client was able to walk away from his house without fear of deficiency liability and without tax liability for debt forgiveness. His attorneys fees were less than $2,000.
If you are no longer able or willing to pay a mortgage for a property without equity it may be a good idea to retain a competent litigation attorney to guide you through the foreclosure process. There is no advantage to cooperating with the lender or making the lender’s job easy; most likely, the lender did not cooperate with you when you asked them to modify your mortgage loan. The homeowners who defend themselves in foreclosure and make their case a more difficult for the lender often get enough leverage in their case to negotiate a release from liability.
posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy attorney, Orlando, Florida
August 20, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452da7f69e200e55416af5f8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should You Hire An Attorney To Defend Mortgage Foreclosure? In Most Cases, "Yes":
Comments
Very interesting article. Thanks for posting and I really enjoy reading your blog Jonathan. My wife bought a condo here in South Florida before I met her and got married to her. The bank gave her a loan of 242K on her 40K salary. Talk about predatory lending ! And yes, it's a 5/1 ARM. The bank was Lehman brothers....Aurora loans. Sweet Karma ! Anyhow, she stopped paying her mortgage in January and only 1 month ago received the lis pendens. We hired a family attorney to draft a letter to respond to all the allegations. It only cost us 300 dollars. Anyhow...this should delay the entire process. She still has not heard about any hearing. outh Florida is just so backed up with foreclosure hearings, that it's amazing ! Anyhow...my primary goal is to help her to avoid any deficiency judgment in the future. This is critical...because when I want to buy a home and am going to rely on her income to help pay the bills, the last thing I need is for her checks to be garnished. Can you please send me via email the attorney friend of yours in the original post you are referring to. It seems he knows exactly what he is going and we may want to hire him. Please get back to me. His prices seem very reasonable that is what we are looking for since we are both on a tight budget. Thanks !
Posted by: FILO | Sep 21, 2008 10:17:16 AM
A judgment for the creditor would restart the testing period, as would any further bona fide collection activities
Sub: Election tools for your state
Message:
Your state is going to play a key role in the upcoming Presidential Election and our tools will help you in making registration to vote easy and obtaining an absentee ballot.
Please check www.StateDemocracy.org for more information
Posted by: timothy moriarty | Sep 12, 2008 3:31:32 AM
I now think in most cases the homeowner should defend the foreclosure suit
Sub: Election tools for your state
Message:
Your state is going to play a key role in the upcoming Presidential Election and our tools will help you in making registration to vote easy and obtaining an absentee ballot.
Please check www.StateDemocracy.org for more information
Posted by: timothy moriarty | Sep 12, 2008 3:29:54 AM
At least one loss mitigation representative from a large lender has confessed to having hundreds of foreclosure cases to deal with. It's no wonder that so few banks cooperate with loan mod requests when they are that swamped with cases -- it's just easier to let the local attorneys move ahead with foreclosure and expect the homeowners' ignorance of court procedures to lead to an easy victory for the bank.
But it's definitely a better idea for borrowers just to hire an attorney to get them more time and a possible settlement where they won't have to worry about the foreclosure long after they've lost the house and moved out. And further, if the attorney can help delay the process for a few extra months, it might be enough time for the borrowers to sell or save up enough to have some decent chance at repairing their financial lives (relatively) soon after the foreclosure. For a few thousand dollars, the value received is tremendous.
Posted by: Nick | Sep 2, 2008 9:50:43 AM
f you are no longer able or willing to pay a mortgage for a property without equity it may be a good idea to retain a competent litigation attorney to guide you through the foreclosure process.
_________________________________________________________
jammywatson
Florida Alcohol Addiction Treatment
Posted by: jammywatson | Aug 26, 2008 10:06:41 AM
When it comes to the lender placing a 1099 on the homeowner to pay taxes on the difference, wouldn't the new law that passed in November 2007 have protected them?
That law is The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (H.R. 3648).
Curious as to it's affect in circumstances such as the one you've explained.
Thanks.
Posted by: Cibola | Aug 22, 2008 12:49:06 AM
In cases where an individual's primary residence is the one being foreclosed on new federal tax law eliminates cancellation of indebtedness income, however for investment properties COD income is an important consideration.
Ordinarily the lender should readily negotiate the COD issue away, however in the event a lender is obtuse the debtor will need to carefully evaluate whether to allow the properties to go to foreclosure today and leave the COD income issue for another day. It's possible that the lender will sell the deficiency before the expiration of the 36 months-with-no-pursuit testing period, perhaps to a JDB who will sell it again before the witching date for issuing a form 1099-C, and that could continue indefinitely. The debt may never be sued upon, and may finally come to rest in the hands of a person or entity who either fails to file a 1099-C form or who has no requirement to do so (foreign owner).
If the debt is sued upon, a debtor's win on lack of documentation would likely mean that no valid 1099-C could be issued, while a win on statute of limitations grounds would trigger the requirement to issue one. A judgment for the creditor would restart the testing period, as would any further bona fide collection activities.
Although technically the debtor is required to report the defaulted debt as income once the debtor makes the decision to never pay it, that is quite a subjective standard and the only real objective standard for when the debtor must recognize the income is upon the issuance of a 1099-C form.
As I have explained above, that day may never come.
Posted by: Mark Hankins | Aug 21, 2008 2:42:21 PM





